Leobner successfully against illegal repayment of 29,000 euros

Leobner successfully against illegal repayment of 29,000 euros
An incident in Leoben caused the residents to talk about. A universal vehicle guide who recently ended his job was suddenly faced with a high repayment claim of over 29,000 euros. This amount was supposed to cover the costs for his training, which he had completed with the former employer. The claim naturally caused a significant concern and incomprehension among the person concerned.
It was a return replacement agreement that the employer wanted to assert in this case. This procedure could bring many to the question of whether such repayment claims are legal after termination. The Leobner, whose name was not published, successfully resisted the claim. Thanks to the support of the Chamber of Labor (AK) Leoben , clarification and ultimately to take back the illegal claim.
The predicament of the ex-worker
After completing his conclusion, the Leobner was in the belief that he had completely earned the training costs. However, when he terminated his job, he received the surprising message that he had to repay over 29,000 euros. In addition, the employer had failed to pay him credited claims of around 2,000 euros. Such additional financial burdens can become a real challenge for an employee after termination.
The situation took a turn when the LEABER Chamber of Labor took the book. The AK experts examined the underlying agreement and came to the conclusion that it had not been set up in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. It turned out that the agreement was only signed after the start of the training and was therefore legally ineffective. This is an important point, because the legal framework for repayment claims is very strict and cannot be stretched arbitrarily.
The role of the Chamber of Labor
The assessment and support of the Chamber of Labor proved to be crucial. Due to its intervention, the repayment claim was quickly and successfully withdrawn. Such relapses in the crisis of trust between employers and employees can be very sustainable based on this situation. It is still unclear how the ex-employer reacted to the withdrawal of the claim, but it is clear how important it is to be clear about your own rights in termination.
This situation impressively shows that employees are not defenseless even when termination. The clear legal situation, supported by specialist knowledge such as that of the Chamber of Labor, ensures that illegal claims cannot simply be enforced. In a world in which employment relationships are becoming more and more precarious, this case could serve as an example how important it is to find out about your own rights and, if necessary, to take advantage of help.