Scandal about ÖSV star: Doping allegations despite immune disease!

Scandal about ÖSV star: Doping allegations despite immune disease!

In a shocking case in the sports area, the athlete Mario Seidl, who suffers from the rare immune disease, has a impending judgment about blood doping. Seidl won three World Cup bronze with the ÖSV team in his career and the Olympic bronze in 2018. He sees the current link of his person with doping allegations as a serious setback for his sporting future, especially since irregularities in his blood pass led to his conviction by sports authorities and the International Sports Court (CAS). Despite these serious allegations, there is no official confirmation from CAS and NADA for the incidents.

Seidl has tried to clarify the blood counts interpreted as incorrectly interpreted, which led to the doping allegations. It is reported that the cause has heavily burdened him with both mentally and financially. In retrospect, the block imposed on him and a half ago has now expired, which is why it remains unclear whether he can continue his career as an A-squad athlete. Nevertheless, Seidl plans to continue the decision.

Comparison to other doping cases

The situation is reminiscent of the over 16 years of the German skill runner Claudia Pechstein. Her allegations of doping were always rejected by her; She attributed her fluctuating blood values to an inherited blood tanomaly. Recent judgments, such as that of the Munich Higher Regional Court, which the arbitration agreement between Pechstein and the World Association ISU declared ineffective, could now influence the entire sports jurisdiction. The verdict found that the CAS is questionable as a neutral arbitration in this context and issues far -reaching consequences for future doping cases.

Pechstein has submitted a claim for damages against the ISU of 4.4 million euros, which is only negotiated according to a judgment of the Federal Court of Justice. Experts consider a reform of international arbitration than necessary in order to offer athletes more clarity about their appeals.

effects on the sports world

The debates about doping and the responsibility of sports associations are of fundamental interest. Prof. Dr. Peter W. Heerman, specialist in sports law, has discussed the problem of sanctions and its imposition by sports associations in several publications. His research analyze typical pitfalls that can occur in doping procedures and emphasize the need for a fairer system that enables athletes to better defend themselves against illegal sanctions.

Developments around Seidl and Pechstein's cases throw a light light on the challenges that athletes face while trying to prove their innocence. These situations draw a picture of a sports area that stands at the interface between ethical standards, legal responsibility and personal fates.

The processes around Mario Seidl and Claudia Pechstein are still pursued by the sports associations, but also by the athletes, since they could testify a lot about the future framework conditions in dealing with doping allegations and their legal consequences. While Seidl weighs his next steps, it remains to be seen how the legal and sporty implications will develop.

For more information about Mario Seidl's case, visit Kleine Zeitung. For the judgment regarding Claudia Pechstein, see LTO. You can find out more about sports law at Sportrecht.org.