Schnabel complains Hanger: ÖVP-Turkise in the credibility trap!

Schnabel complains Hanger: ÖVP-Turkise in the credibility trap!

Amstetten, Österreich - fpö Amstetten district chairman LAbg. Alexander Schnabel has practiced sharp criticism of Andreas Hanger from the ÖVP. The reason for this argument was Hangar's statement on television, according to which effects of 30, 50 or 80 euros less per month are "emotionally not noticeable". In the event of a beak, this remark comes to a vehement rejection and raises questions about the credibility of the ÖVP. He makes it clear that such statements do not reflect the everyday life of many people who are very well affected by financial losses. Schnabel asks if the FPÖ is really unbelievable just because it questions Hanger's statement.

In addition, Schnabel Hanger accuses of spreading fake news about the State Councilor Luisser in connection with a Postschacher accusation. This underlines the urgency with which beak wants to question the credibility of political communication. He also calls for a revocation of this wrong information. "The values ​​and the credibility compass at the Hanger ÖVP have been lost," explains Schnabel.

changed communication landscape

The debate between Schnabel and Hanger takes place against a background that illuminates the changed communication channels in political space. In an increasingly hybrid media system, social media have revolutionized the way in which citizens, politicians and journalists interact. Political institutions today reach mass audience directly, without the traditional media as an intermediary. This has changed the flow of communication, so that citizens can now also act "Bottom up" with political actors, as the [bpb] (https://www.bpb.de/themen/medien-journalism/social-Medien/545485/Sziale-Medien-und--kommuniker-und-- stateliche-institutions/).

Another aspect of this development is evident in digital communication: Political parties have increased their social media teams and integrate specific influencer marketing into their communication strategies. The use of social media such as YouTube, Facebook and Instagram to obtain young voters is becoming increasingly sophisticated, which is also reflected in the election campaign functions that aim to inform, inform and mobilize.

criticism of the political credibility

The allegations of Schnabel to the ÖVP are part of a greater discourse on the authenticity and reliability of political statements in the digital age. Citizens are increasingly skeptical and demand for transparency in political communication. At the same time, folk parties such as the CDU/CSU and the SPD have falling voices, which makes it clear that the traditional parties have difficulty keeping their regular electorate. This could indicate the need to formulate their messages more clearly and more credibly.

An analysis of the Situation shows that negative messages can create a high user reaction and visibility in social media, which further tightens the challenges for the credibility of political communication. The Federal Government has been trying to go into a dialogue with the population for many years through platforms such as YouTube and Facebook, but also sees challenges such as data protection, hate pecher and polarization.

In this light, Schnabel's criticism of Hanger and the ÖVP comes to an apell equally, political communication to measure more weight and credibility. The question of how politicians react to social media and position themselves in this new communication landscape remains crucial for voters.