Maradona process bursts: Judge withdrawn because of a documentary!

Maradona process bursts: Judge withdrawn because of a documentary!

On May 29, 2025, a legal drama about the late football star Diego Maradona gave up. The criminal trial against his medical team was recently re -rolled up when a judge of the three -member chamber resigned due to the applications for bias. This decision caused the previous process to be declared void. Judge Julieta Makintach, who had previously been suspended for 90 days from the service, must have the accusation of having participated in an unsubstantiated documentary about the process. In a trailer and a draft for a first episode of this documentary, elements of the procedure have already been presented, which increased the distrust of their impartiality.

In this process, which is located in San Isidro north of Buenos Aires, seven doctors and nurses from Maradona have been on trial since March. The defendants include Maradona's lovers Leopoldo Luque and his psychiatrist Agustina Cosachov. They are accused of homicide, which could be punished with a conviction with prison sentences of up to 25 years. However, everyone involved rejected the allegations. Investigators show massive mistakes in the home care of the world champion in 1986, which died of a heart attack on November 25, 2020 at the age of 60. Before his death he had undergone a brain surgery.

background of the procedure

The Maradona case not only raises legal questions, but also deeper ethical and medical considerations. Reporting on the process on social media and various platforms such as Ethics Committee gained in importance, where similar case studies and ethical challenges are also discussed in healthcare. In its publications, the Academy of Ethics in Medicine addresses the responsibility of health service providers and the importance of patient will.

It is assumed that the mistakes in the care of Maradona are not only to be found on individual but also on a structural level. The focus is on the ethical questions about the responsibility of doctors and the system of medical care. The case could be discussed by this debate that the discussion about the appropriate color of medical care in an emergency and the monitoring of doctors.

In view of the complexity of the case and the associated legal and ethical issues, the public is excited to see how the process will develop and which precedent cases could result from this critical process.