Criticism of the double budget 2025/26: Reasons endanger the future!

Criticism of the double budget 2025/26: Reasons endanger the future!

The analysis of the double budget 2025/26 by the expert: Inside the AK Vienna, the focus focuses on the challenges of this budget planning. They show that the budget is all about consolidation, which is due to the ongoing recession and the inefficient budget policy of the previous government. The deficit has risen sharply, while at the same time the requirements for the state, such as unemployment, poverty risk, income inequality, demographic change as well as the green and digital transformation, increase. In this difficult context, the government pursues a middle ground, but without clear solutions as far as the treatment of central concerns is concerned.

A focus of the AK analysis lies on educational policy offensive measures, the importance of which is emphasized. Nevertheless, the budget does not fully meet central claims. This is recognized as a result of the compromise from failed coalition negotiations, which relied on cuts. These incisions not only have direct negative effects on business and employment, but also on income, gender equality and climate protection. Measures such as increasing taxes to oversprints of energy companies and banks finance certain offensive measures, but prove to be inadequate.

priorities and effects of the cuts

The goal of the government is to reduce the deficit from 4.7 % of GDP from 4.7 % by 2026. However, according to the AK Expert's assessment: the budget path is pessimistic inside by 2026, with improvements being required. In addition to the measures after 2026, the deficit must be reduced further, while offensive measures in the field of education, climate and social security are necessary. It is clear that consolidation measures have to be planned in the long term in order to avoid follow -up costs.

particularly critically: Inside cuts in the health sector and with social welfare recipients: inside. These cuts show a negative distribution of the budget, for example by the deletion of the climate monus and the non -evaluation of social benefits. In the field of education there is an increase in funds for the opportunities bonus as well as for German funding and a mandatory kindergarten year, there is no sufficient investments in day care and the training of educator: inside.

ideas for consolidation

In another analysis, suggestions for budget consolidation from the website white economy are presented. These are based on aggregated sizes without concrete measures and offer an overview of possible measures for household consolidation. The list includes proposals such as the deletion of the climate bonus, the increase in VAT and a temporary increase in corporation tax. However, the effects and the overall economic ratings remain unclear.

The savings from the proposed measures are considerable, at around EUR 16.2 billion by 2027. This is to be achieved in 2025 estimated savings of around EUR 5.7 billion. It should be noted that large measures are easier to quantify than many small ones, which directs the focus on a few major measures.

long -term challenges of government finances

In the context of long-term state finances, the Bundesbank pointed out the importance of stable, neto-editage boundaries in a report. These are intended to stabilize the debt rate below 60 % and help to achieve the desired household goals. The proposed frame is based on EU rules and takes into account the challenges of a possible weak growth. The task of the legislators will be to decide on the exact limit values ​​and to check them regularly in order to be able to make adjustments to the economic conditions.