Emission trade under pressure: Green light or dangerous game?

Die Debatte um den Emissionshandel und EU-Klimaziele bis 2040 gewinnt an Fahrt, während Bedenken zur Bürokratie und ökologischen Effektivität laut werden.
The debate about emissions trading and EU climate goals until 2040 is gaining driving while concerns about bureaucracy and ecological effectiveness are loud. (Symbolbild/DNAT)

Emission trade under pressure: Green light or dangerous game?

In the context of the EU climate goals, new regulations on emission trade could have a deep impact on the Union's climate policy. As the Kleine Zeitung are currently being discussed, as EU-financed CO2-infrolings on abroad can be counted. The ambitious goal of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions by at least 90 percent compared to 1990 is the focus of the debate.

But there are concerns how best to meet these goals. Green EU MP Lena Schilling expressed criticism of the plans and pointed out contradictions that relate to the statements of EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU climate commissioner WoPke Hoekstra. Schilling warned of possible problems with the integration of Article 6 of the Paris set of rules into the climate goals of the 2040s, especially since expensive carbon certificates from abroad could reduce incentive for the member states to take their own climate protection measures.

reactions to the emission trade discussion

The discussion about emission trade goes hand in hand with the challenge of how the EU can achieve its climate neutrality by 2050. The EU was asked to do so as a long-term goal in the context of the to set. The emission reduction target for 2050 is to be increased to 55 percent. This is part of the more comprehensive efforts to limit the increase in global average temperature in order to meet the climate goals of the Paris Agreement, which aim to keep global warming to well below 2 ° C.

Alexander Bernhuber, environmental spokesman for the ÖVP in the European Parliament, at least expects the EU Commission to reduce bureaucratic hurdles, as these would make it difficult to implement the climate goals. At the same time, he warns of relocating production facilities in third countries, which could ultimately harm climate protection. Emission certificates could offer relief at short notice, but are not a panacea, according to Bernhuber.

challenges of the Green Deals

The bureaucratic effort of the Green Deal is also criticized. So far, the EU has reacted to the challenges, among other things by extending the deadlines for compliance with climate specifications in the automotive sector. While this flexibility is considered necessary by some, the Greens consider it a softening of the specified requirements.

The Convention of Paris , which was passed at the climate conference in Paris in 2015 To limit pre -industrial level. It asks the states to present ambitious national climate protection contributions (NDCs) and to steer financial flows into low -emission developments.

The current discussions in the EU show the tensions that exist between the need for flexibility and the need for strict climate goals. Ultimately, the success of the climate minitiatives will depend to what extent the member states rethink their methods of reducing emission and how effectively they work together in the coming years.

Details
OrtEuropa, Europa
Quellen