Alarming study: forbidden pesticides discovered in Austrian paprika powder!

Alarming study: forbidden pesticides discovered in Austrian paprika powder!
Österreich - On May 19, 2025, Greenpeace published alarming results from an examination of paprika powder in Austrian supermarkets. In a market check, 13 samples were tested for pesticides, with terrifying results. Overall, the environmental protection organization discovered 37 different sprays in the rehearsals, whereby all conventional products contained pesticide cocktails with 10 to 19 different artery lifts. It is particularly worrying that the limit values have been exceeded in two samples.
The detection of 12 pesticides that are prohibited in the EU is particularly alarming. Among the tested brands were examples such as "Las Hermanas sharp", which was strained 13 times more with the carcinogenic pesticide "Anthrachinon" than allowed, as well as "Kotányi pepper", which contained almost twice as much chlorine papyr. In contrast, organic products performed significantly better and were only slightly stressed, which underlines Greenpeace's demand for strengthening biological agriculture and a larger organic offer in Austria.
overview of the loads
Almost all samples showed chlorate, a fabric that is prohibited in the EU as a pesticide but may be used as a disinfectant. Greenpeace appeals to Agriculture Minister Norbert Tettschnig and Minister of Health Korinna Schumann to enforce stricter protective standards in the EU. The main growing countries for peppers are Spain, Hungary, Peru and China, whereby the majority of the tested products come from Spain.
EU policy in the context of the pesticide debate
In the larger context of this problem, the EU Commission recently failed with a push for drastic reduction in pesticides by 2030. A draft law that provided a reduction by 50 % compared to 2013-2017 was rejected by the European Parliament. This law would also have provided a 65 %reduction in funds classified as "dangerous".
The farmers' association Copa-Cogeca welcomed the decision against the law and described it as "unrealistic" and "poorly adapted". Conservative MPs expressed concerns that high restrictions for farmers would be associated with this. However, environmental organizations such as the federal government sharply criticized the rejection and warned of a loss of people, nature and nutritional certainty, since the law would also have provided a complete ban on pesticides in sensitive areas. The decision could have a negative impact on the efforts of more environmentally friendly agriculture, especially with regard to the recently extended glyphosate approval.
In view of the results of the Greenpeace examination and current political developments, it becomes clear that the protection of the environment and health of consumers continues to be an urgent challenge. The demand for stricter controls and increased promotion of organic food is getting louder.For further information, see the article by Tagesschau .
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Österreich |
Quellen |