Ukrainian mineral deal: Symbolism is sufficient Trump

Ukrainian mineral deal: Symbolism is sufficient Trump

CNN reports that the recently signed agreement on minerals between Ukraine and the United States brings both positive news and a symbolic meaning. Nevertheless, it is ultimately a forced deal with a complex future .

background of the agreement

The Ukraine mineral agreement with the United States is the result of months of difficult negotiations and goes back to a Ukrainian initiative that was originally proposed during the friendlier times of bidding administration. Since then, it has developed into a steady thorn in the eye of the already tense relationships between Kiev and Washington. President Wolodymyr Selenskyj had hardly any other choice than signing something to avoid another profound crisis in his relationship with President Donald Trump.

prospects for the future

The document that CNN is available laid the foundation for a long -term relationship between the USA and Ukraine. Although it does not offer a waterproof guarantee for US profits in the coming years of the Trump administration, it emphasizes the symbolic meaning of the agreement. Trump needed the feeling that America got something back from Kiev, while Ukraine had to show that its relationship with this white house was functional and evil.

important points of the agreement

The agreement also contains two formulations that Kyiv should be particularly pleased about. On the one hand, reference is made to the "massive destruction, caused by Russia's extensive invasion in Ukraine" - a clear allocation of blame for a white house that has often acted cautiously. On the other hand, it is explained how Ukraine may acquire weapons from the USA - particularly important in view of the escalating Russian attack on the front.

It is stated that when the USA grants new military help to Ukraine, "the capital contribution of the US partner (to the fund) is considered increased, based on the estimated value of this military aid". In short, Ukraine will use this fund to pay for weapons. So far, it was unclear whether the Trump administration would provide weapons-in particular urgently needed patriot rocket defense systems. This agreement now explains how Ukraine can pay for it.

political implications and challenges

The agreement underlines a central message of this heavily stricken process: Trump moves again in the direction of a position that benefits Ukraine. While Russia continues to reject the US Ukrainian proposal for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire, which has now passed almost 50 days, the specific regulation in the contract, as can be financed by Ukraine, will certainly be perceived in the walls of the Kremlin.

long -term perspectives

The symbolic nature of the document is also partly due to the fact that it offers long-term perspectives and that political change has been ahead in the coming decades before it can actually lead to significant financial results in the US funds. Neither Kiev nor Washington will have the same governments over the next three years, even if the war should end tomorrow.

FAZIT

Although the agreement appears large and potentially pioneering, its immediate influence is predominantly symbolic and could be seen as a short -term pavement. It remains complicated and contradictory, but it could be clear enough for Trump.