Russia's neighbors in Europe raise land mines bans - outrage grows
Russia's neighbors in Europe raise land mines bans - outrage grows
They are considered one of the most dangerous and indiscriminant weapons in the world. Nevertheless, five European countries have made their back on an international contract for the use of Lead Russia as a reason.
retreat from the Ottawa contract
Finland, Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania - all bordering on the border with Russia - took steps to from the ottawa-contract . This contract prohibits the use of anti -person mines that are designed to make fatal mischief or mutilate people if they are entered.
reactions of human rights organizations
The developments have alerted campaign drivers who have been reintroduced by the worldwide tens of civilians and can contaminate one area for decades after the end of a conflict - as worrying step backwards. The contract signed in 1997, which also prohibits the production and storage of these weapons, is praised to have significantly reduced the damage by land mines.
In response to Finland's decision to step out of the contract, the human rights organization Amnesty International warned that the Nordic nation endanger civilian life and described this as "a worrying reset development". The decision "in contradiction to decades of progress in the elimination of production, transfer and use of nature from nature," said the NGO.
withdrawals and new security strategies
At the beginning of this year, the pact had 165 Member States. But large power blocks such as Russia, China, India, Pakistan and the United States have never joined him. In March, Poland and the three Baltic states announced their retreat in a joint statement and called for a rethink about the weapons that are acceptable in view of the aggression in Russia. These countries emphasized that they have to offer their armed forces more "flexibility and freedom of choice" to strengthen the defense of the eastern NATO flank.
In the following month, Latvia became the first country to formally escaped from the contract after the parliament was strongly behind the proposal. This means that Riga could start again after a waiting period of six months with the accumulation of landmines. Also this month Finland presented plans to follow Latvia. The Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the step and emphasized that Russia is a long-term danger to all of Europe: "The resignation from the Ottawa Treaty will give us the opportunity to prepare us for the changes in the security policy environment."
relationships with the war situation in Ukraine
These announcements are made, while US President Donald Trump intensifies his efforts to end the war in Ukraine. This has aroused fears in neighboring countries that Moscow could prepare themselves again and to target them. The Russia and Eurasia expert Keir Giles believes that Moscow, no matter how the conflict in Ukraine ends, will prepare for the next goal. "There is no doubt that Russia is looking for other means to achieve its goals in Europe," said Giles.
Giles recognizes the military advantages of using landmines. These underground explosives can slow down an invasion by redirecting or stopping troops to more easily defending areas while trying to penetrate the suspended areas. For countries that defend themselves against an army with a larger number, they can be of particular use. "They are an extremely effective means of strengthening the defense forces of a numerically inferior country," he said.
dangers for the civilian population
, however, he made it clear that western countries would not use landmines in the same way as the Russian armed forces. "There are very different design philosophies between countries that are not concerned about civilian victims or deliberately bring about them, and those who try to avoid them." In the Ukraine, extensive Russian minefields along the south case lines slowed down a counter -offensive in Ukraine in the summer of 2023.
The country is considered the most popular country in the world, according to the United Nations. The Ukrainian government estimates assumed that the Moscow armed forces have covered 174,000 square kilometers (65,637 square miles) of the Ukrainian territory with landmines and explosive residues.
The humanitarian dimension
This means that Ukrainian civilians, especially those who have returned to previously contested areas, are exposed to constant risk. "The large -scale contamination of land through explosive ordnance has created an 'invisible threat' in the minds of people," warned the international charity organization Humanity & Inclusion in a report from February on the use of country mines in Ukraine. "As a result, the movements of the people are extremely restricted; they can no longer order their country and are their social, economical or professional activities disabled. “
demand for responsibility
When Helsinki announced his plans for leaving the Ottawa Treaty, the country emphasized that it would use weapons in a humane way. The country's president, Alexander Stubb, wrote on X: "Finland undertakes to his international obligations regarding the responsible commitment of mines."
While the responsible use of landmines is a complex topic, measures to reduce civilian damage can contain precise records over mine fields and their locations, to clarify the community about the dangers and to clear or neutralize the weapons after the conflict is terminated.
a worrying step backwards
Despite such commitments, campaign leaders felt horrified by the withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty. Landmins have killed or mutilated tens of thousands of civilians worldwide and continue to do damage. In the report of the Landmine and Cluster ammunition monitor for 2024 it was found that at least 5,757 people were killed and injured by mines and explosive residues in 2023, with civilians made up for 84 % of this number.
Alma Taslidžan, who was driven out of her homeland from Bosnia during the war in the early 90s, returned with her family to a country that was crossed by Landminen - a contamination problem that, in her opinion, is still striking the country. Now she works for the disabled facility Humanity & Inclusion and described the decision of the five countries to step out of the contract as "absolute nonsense" and "the most terrible thing that can happen to a contract".
She told CNN that the arguments for a ban on landmines have not changed since the introduction of the Ottawa Treaty in the 1990s. "As soon as they are in the ground, they are a danger. They cannot distinguish between the foot of a civilian and that of a child or soldier." She continued: "We are surprised that such advanced military, like the Finnish, such as the Estonians, Lithuanians and Latvians, are seriously considering adding this extremely indiscriminant weapon in their military strategy and, which is worse, to use them in their country."
For others, the new, precarious security situation means that Europe is confronted with the fact that previous red lines now have to be discussed. Giles sees the latest developments as a recognition of the countries that contracts on landmines were "an act of idealism that has since proven to be over -optimistic in view of the developments in the world."
Kommentare (0)