Laboratory leak or animal market? Latest theories for Covid-19 exposed!

Laboratory leak or animal market? Latest theories for Covid-19 exposed!

Wuhan, China - The debate about the origins of Covid-19 remains precarious and controversial. Latest information from the White House suggests that the theory of a natural origin of the virus is not durable. According to information from the Trump government, there is a lot of indication that the virus comes from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. These findings are supported by various scientific studies and risk analyzes.

The white house particularly accuses the virologist Anthony Fauci of misleading the public about the creation of Covid-19. Fauci is accused of commissioning the publication "The Proximal Origin of Sars-Cov-2" in order to discredit the laboratory leak theory and to promote the idea of ​​natural origin. Several evidence, including the biological nature of the virus and the circumstances of its spread, increase the suspicion of a laboratory jump.

indications of a laboratory jump

The US government leads several points that support the laboratory leak theory. The virus has a biological property that does not occur in nature. In addition, all COVID-19 cases are due to a single introduction in humans, which is in contrast to previous pandemics, in which several spillover events occurred. The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a leading research center for SARS viruses, is particularly concerned, which has been reported in the past inadequate security measures. Furthermore, researchers from the institute in autumn 2019 suffered covid-like symptoms before the virus outbreak had officially started.

A report by the US Department of Defense states that American soldiers who were in Wuhan in October 2019 also suffered from covid-like symptoms. There are also reports from athletes from Europe who had similar symptoms. The Federal Intelligence Service (BND) assumes a probability of 80 to 95 percent that the virus comes from a Chinese laboratory.

scientific opinions and new risk analyzes

scientists are disagreed with the origins of Sars-Cov-2. However, a new risk analysis indicates that the laboratory hypothesis is more likely than a natural origin. This analysis, which was carried out by the German Bundeswehr with the help of the Grunow Finke-Instrument (MGft), supports this thesis, even though it emphasizes that both natural and laboratory origins should be considered.

Some experts such as Roman Wölfel, head of the Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology, demand care. Wölfel argues that the results of the risk analysis are not sufficiently meaningful and that scientists should handle this information carefully. He also emphasizes that there are currently no indications of a deliberate development of the virus as a biological fighter.

The argument about the origin of Covid-19 is still accompanied by great political and scientific tensions. While past studies show evidence of an origin of the virus in wild animals on the Wuhan market, there has been clear scientific clarification of the matter so far. In a context that is shaped by conspiracy theories and political maneuvers, the discussion about the origins of the virus is more current than ever.