Trump threatens Canada, Panama and Greenland: America first explains everything

Trump threatens Canada, Panama and Greenland: America first explains everything

cnn- Donald Trump's imperialist ambitions in Greenland, Canada and Panama often remind of the thoughts of a real estate sharks that equate the hunting for new deals. But behind his expansionist mindset there is a clear methodology. Trump deals with questions of national security in his own way with which the United States is shaped in a new world, which is characterized by China's rise, the inequality of globalization, the melting polar ice cream and the instability of great powers.

America first: Trump's principles

his attitude also embodies the principle of "America First", which uses the US strength to tirelessly pursue the closest national interests, even at the expense of smaller, ally powers. Trump's considerations to terminate the Panama Canal contract illustrate the endeavor of the new administration to counteract the influence of foreign powers on the western hemisphere. This is not a new concern-it runs through American history, which goes back to Monroe doctrine in the 1820s when European colonialists were the threat.

Trump's dangers in foreign policy

Trump's conviction that the United States should take over the rule in their own sphere of influence is an important indication of how to manage central geopolitical challenges, such as war in Ukraine or possible tensions with Taiwan. But his neocolonialist procedure in the 21st century is a considerable risk and could lead to the power of America's power by damaging alliances that have been built up over generations and alienates his friends.

military threats and strategic ambitions

Trump added further fire to the already tense world events on Tuesday with a statement about the Panama Canal and Greenland when a reporter asked him whether he could exclude violence to recapture the Panama Canal or to take on the strategically important Greenland. "I will not commit to this, no," said Trump in Mar-A-Lago. “It could be that you have to do something.”

The Canadians breathed in when they learned that the elected president was not planning to send the 82nd airland division over the 49th in parallel. He explained that he only wanted to use economic means to integrate the proud sovereign democracy in the north and make it the 51st state. As is so often the case with Trump, his threats were given a mixture of malice and Schalk.

The view of better deals

It is unlikely that Trump will get what he hopes for from Canada, Panama or Greenland. Instead, his strategy could aim to achieve better conditions for the United States-perhaps a discount for American ships that cross the key waterway between the Atlantic and the Pacific, better access to rare earth in Greenland and trade agreements with Canada that benefits US manufacturers. Trump will surely represent each of these achievements as a massive victory, even if they prove to be rather cosmetic, similar to his first trade contract with Mexico and Canada.

a grip -on principle: you are solely responsible

Trump's threats underpin one of his basic foreign policy beliefs: that each country should aggressively pursue its goals unilaterally, which inevitably benefits, wealthy nations such as the USA. "As President, I rejected the failed approaches to the past and proudly put America in the first place, as you should put your countries in the first place. That is okay-you should do that," Trump said at the UN General Assembly 2020.

consequences for international relationships

Trump's authoritarian approach could also lead to not recognizing the difference between US -allied and opponents. On Tuesday, he complained, Canada, America's geographical friend, would rely on the US defense umbrella and should therefore be a state and not a nation. Such a perspective contradicts the liberal order led by the USA, which sees alliances as investments that multiply American power and protect democracy and freedom.

a retreat from the world or new geopolitical strategies?

The sending of troops to secure the Panama Canal or Greenland could also contradict Trump's warnings on the election campaign that the United States should withdraw from new foreign entanglements. But it could embody the ideology "America First". A withdrawal from the Old World in a Trump's second term could be replaced by a "continentalism" that could displace "globalism".

Trump's daring rhetoric and the reaction of the world

Trump's expansive vision shows his unshakable self -confidence during his second term that he wants to use to push a striking stamp on the global role of America. At the same time, his presentation of the principle that the strong triumphs over the weak, also shape his handling of other global political issues, especially the war in Ukraine. In a remarkable moment on Tuesday, Trump expressed that he understood the feeling of security of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was concerned that the nation he had taken could become NATO member.

The possibility that Trump could be ready to accept Putin's conditions was already worrying. At a meeting between Trump and Putin, the Russian President expressed historical US concerns about his own area of influence and took this opportunity to manipulate Trump. If one demands that the moral equality between the US interventions in Latin America and the Russian invasion of Ukraine should be cited from the Monroe doctrine.

international reactions to Trump's procedure

Trump's rhetoric may like his supporters. But many foreigners find them arrogant. The attempt to take over the Panama Canal would be seen as geopolitical piracy. An invasion of Greenland would mock international law. The Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whose already sealed career has suffered another blow through Trump's customs threats, mocked Trump's demands on the 'big white north'. "There is no chance that Canada would become part of the United States," he wrote on X.

These reactions show the downside of Trump's approach. His bullying against America's friends could alienate entire population groups. Some foreign policy experts fear that American threats and pressure in Latin America could actually drive nations closer to China.

Trump's disregard for patriotism from other peoples could also poison the long -lasting friendships of America. "The majority in Greenland find it quite scary and uncomfortable that the United States showed in a disrespectful way that you want to buy or control Greenland," said Aaja Chemnitz, a member of the Danish Parliament and Greenland resident. “Greenland is not Maga. Greenland will not be a maga.”