Bang in Luxembourg: ECJ judgment for Afghan women's rights activists!

Bang in Luxembourg: ECJ judgment for Afghan women's rights activists!

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently made a judgment with far -reaching effects on European asylum policy. Afghan women who are exposed to systematic persecution due to their gender are therefore fundamentally entitled to asylum in Europe. This decision emphasizes brutal reality that is exposed to women in Afghanistan, such as forced marriages and a lack of protection against domestic violence, which emphasizes the need for uniform protection in Europe.

The judge's judge of the ECJ is based on the complaints of two women from Afghanistan in Austria, whose asylum applications were previously only recognized as subsidiary protection. According to the ECJ, not every individual case has to prove a concrete persecution. The mere fact of being a woman and Afghan is enough to be recognized as a refugee in Europe. This means a fundamental change in the way asylum applications of Afghan women are processed , as reports www.freilich-magazin.com .

different reactions to the judgment

The reactions to the judgment are mixed. Elisabeth Grossmann from the SPÖ praises the decision as an important step against anti -feminist structures in Afghanistan and describes them as urgently necessary for the protection of women's rights. In contrast, Petra Steger from the FPÖ criticizes the judgment Harsch, since in her opinion it creates a reasonless asylum law for all women. It demands a stricter control of asylum policy and has concerns about the influence of European civilization.

Another echo came from AfD politician René Springer, who expressed his discomfort about a possible family reunification. He sees a threat to the social structure of Europe, since in his opinion a "faceless bureaucracy" decides on serious fates.

effects on the asylum policy of the EU

The decision of the ECJ leaves deep traces in European asylum policy. Member States are now obliged to create fewer strict criteria when evaluating asylum applications for Afghan women. It is unclear whether this will result in a complete redesign of asylum policy. In Austria, the judgment is currently being debated violently, as fears that the number of asylum applications by Afghan women could increase significantly.

The FPÖ has already requested a more restrictive course in asylum policy and is urging stronger controls when entering. In the meantime, it remains to be seen how the European Union will react to this new challenge as a whole. It is clear that the situation in Afghanistan and the fate of many women continue to remain a burning point on the political agenda , as explained in the article by www.freilich-magazin.com .