Election campaign in Leipzig: CDU demands tougher deportations despite resistance!

Election campaign in Leipzig: CDU demands tougher deportations despite resistance!

Leipzig, Deutschland - The debate about deportations in Leipzig is in full swing, especially through the CDU parliamentary group, which migration has identified as a central election campaign topic. At a city council request on December 18, CDU City Councilor Lucas Schopphoven asked for the reasons why planned deportations have often not been carried out since 2022. According to the regulatory office, four planned deportations were not realized during this period for reasons such as non -meetings or refusal to the home state. The actual figures are low: only five deportations took place in 2022, in 2023 there were two and twelve have been completed for 2024. A large number of people who are obliged to leave are considerable bureaucratic and humanitarian obstacles, as the regulatory office explains: from family ties to missing ID documents.

The reality of the immigration authority

The immigration authority Leipzig, which is structured with 124 employees, has a main task that extends to the purely legal clarification of the residence of foreigners in Leipzig. Like Auslaenderbehoerde.org , the tasks of the authority include the granting of residence titles, tolerations and transfer as part of the Dublin regulations. The CDU parliamentary group was particularly interested in the subject of deportations, but the authority is not only working in this area. Four employees are dealing specifically with the measures that can be released, while the majority of the workforce is responsible for the integration of migrants. This leads to an overload of the authority, especially since the increase in refugees from Ukraine, which has further claimed personnel resources.

The discrepancy between the political demands for more deportations and the actual situation can also be seen in the current figures. While 1,956 people in Leipzig are currently considered to be enforceable, there are numerous legal and humanitarian reasons for the legislative measures that often make deportation impossible. The regulatory office also sees the need for a modern immigration law to increase the efficiency of the immigration authority and reduce complexity in the current asylum system. CDU inquiries on this diversity of topics often bring the authority to its information limits, as Schopphoven had to make clear when the city of Leipzig did not have all the required data available. This situation not only illustrates the challenges of dealing with migration in Germany, but also the confusion and uncertainty in the political debate about it.