Pensioner Doris G. am pillory: High fine for Facebook comment!

Pensioner Doris G. am pillory: High fine for Facebook comment!

A shit storm of the unexpected way: 74-year-old pensioner Doris G. has air on Facebook-and now you are banging the judiciary on the head! For a strongly migration -critical comment on a quote from Economics Minister Robert Habeck, in which he describes Germany as a relative to immigration, she was sentenced to a juicy fine of 7,950 euros by the Düsseldorf District Court. The process, which took place in a record-breaking pace of just 30 minutes, gave the impression of a "short process" for the Duisburg pensioner, such as the Axis of the good reported.

The comment by Doris G. was certainly not for a delicacy: "We need specialists and no asylum seekers who just want to make themselves a nice life here," she said under the Facebook post. However, the public prosecutor recognized a potential disturbance in public peace, "suitable to stare at hatred", and had the pensioner charges for sedition. Scandalous, many thought when they noticed that two prosecutors were parked in the case - even only one in the service is often in service! The judgment based on the last sentence of her comment shows that the judiciary does not tolerate faxes these days.

shocking judgment

Without a sluggish shoulder, the pensioner admitted in the court that her choice of words was "a bit violent". Nevertheless, her indignation of Habeck's quote and the associated German migration policy, which she finds it hardly understandable, did not want to take back. In the zeal of the battle, she was shot down a little, but incitement? "I didn't get a people," she defended herself.

The dish remained hard. The single judge Tobias Kampmann emphasized that comments like that of Doris G. could split society. The judge showed no mercy at all, but the defense repulsed: no state, no policy could be so sensitive to such criticism, argued lawyer Dieter Kottirre argued. But in the end the sentence - 150 daily rates - was essential from the judge's point of view, a heavy load on the shoulders of a pensioner who lives from a rather narrow 1,600 euros a month.

on knife cutting edge

Peter Hemmelrath, the court reporter, observed that this process was also a political grade. Has the pensioner said too critically, or was it incredible? This remains the subject of a potential appeal before the Düsseldorf District Court. Whether Doris G. will walk through the instances will probably be decided in the next few days. If the judgment becomes final, it would need almost two decades to pay off the punishment - a bitter perspective.

Numerous citizens feel trimmed in their opinions if even political forms of expression are punished so strictly. The judgment caused numerous questions about freedom of expression and its limits today. The discussion as to whether such processes ultimately contribute to the maturity of the citizens or rather promote opinion suppression remains exciting. Data and facts from the wide field of case law give the whole an exciting grade, as the data protection declaration itself on patent.achgut.com Website refers.