Haßelmann: AfD should be denied Bundestag post return!

Haßelmann: AfD should be denied Bundestag post return!

In the political lightning storm of the republic, a statement by Britta Haßelmann, a leading voice of the Greens, makes the mind cooked! No space for right-wing populism, according to the clear announcement of the co-boss of the Greens in the Bundestag. In an interview with the Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, she makes a short process with the ambitions of the AfD to a central position in the Bundestag. This party, some of which is classified as extremist, should be kept away from responsibility and power to protect democratic institutions from their influence, such as "https://apollo-news.net/die-afd-kein-kin-- on- Bundesagtag-bundet-die-vizechefin-der-gruenen-fraction/" target = "_ blank" Rel = "NOFOLLOW NORFERRE NOOPENER"> Apollo News reports .

A hammer strike for the AfD, which despite all efforts in the current legislative period could not set a foot in the door of the Bundestag Presidium. Despite proposed candidates for the coveted Vice Presidential post, they failed due to the vote of the majority. Haßelmann claps for this determination - a steadfast wall of democracy was preserved!

Who stops the AfD?

The AfD may rumble and urge, but their attempts to climb into the Bundestag position are repeatedly averted by the strategic unity of the other political groups. With the support of the CDU, SPD and FDP, the AfD remains on the replacement bank. A triumph of the democratic unity, which Haßelmann is familiar with and which should also be continued in the upcoming legislature, appeals vigorously.

Haßelmann leaves no doubt that the authorization of the AfD of holding important positions remains an overly questionable undertaking. The judicial confirmation from the Federal Constitutional Court that the AfD can propose its candidates does not change their absenteeism by no majority in parliament.

another dam break?

This political barricade should not only exist on stubbornness. For Haßelmann, it is an obligation to stable and just democracy. Admittedly, it seems hard for one or the other - but the past has shown that comfort security must not be an option if democracy is at stake.