Merz demands Nucleare participation: Europe needs a new security course!

Merz demands Nucleare participation: Europe needs a new security course!

In a heated debate about nuclear security in Europe, the designated Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, expressed clear positions. Merz, who is considered a possible future chancellor, found that the "nuclear participation" was an important topic that Germany must talk to France and Great Britain about in the future. Despite these suggestions, Merz unequivocally made it clear that Germany would not have its own nuclear weapons. "Germany will not be able to dispose of nuclear weapons themselves," he emphasized, recalling the two-plus four contract, which expressly waived nuclear weapons. This reported oe24.at/welt/deutschland-politik/merz-klareabsage-an-ige-atomwaffen/626278227"> OE24

Emmanuel Macron, President of France, also contributed to the discussion and checks whether French nuclear weapons could also be used to protect European allies. In a television speech, Macron announced that it would open a dialogue about French nuclear deterrence with regard to European security. However, the sole decision on the use of nuclear weapons in the hands of France would remain. "The decision always lies with the President of the Republic," said Macron. These considerations are particularly relevant in the context of increasing uncertainties regarding the US protection in view of the current geopolitical tensions, which are also reinforced by the Ukraine conflict. This reports Tagesanzeiger.ch .

key points of the debate

Merz, the entire security policy situation in Europe has grown dramatically, which requires a coherent answer from the future coalition. Despite certain discussions about the involvement of British and French nuclear weapons into the European security architecture, current German leaders, among other things, have intended to state the current Chancellor Olaf Scholz. This position raises questions about the extent to which the proposed European solutions can actually be seen as a replacement for American protection.