SPÖ supports monitoring of endangers for safe Austria
SPÖ supports monitoring of endangers for safe Austria
Maximilian Köllner, the SPÖ area spokesman for internal security, has expressed a positive statement about the government's measures for danger monitoring. In a statement, he emphasizes that this initiative aims to combat extremism and terrorism in order to make Austria safer. The SPÖ emphasizes compliance with the constitution and the protection of fundamental rights as central points. Köllner finds it particularly important that all legal regulations remain within the framework of the constitution in order to strengthen the trust of the population in the state measures. OTS appeals to the FPÖ to focus on serious security interests and not against monitoring Wetting. In particular, Köllner refers to earlier statements by Herbert Kickl, who described monitoring in 2018 as the "protective shield for the population".
In his speech, Köllner criticizes the FPÖ for an apparent change in their attitude to the danger monitoring. While the FPÖ categorized the monitoring as a necessary step for security, current positions seem to be rather negative. The SPÖ plans a comprehensive assessment of the law in order to clear up possible concerns of the citizens. Köllner suspects that the FPÖ is not seriously interested in the security of the citizens, but is pursuing political motives.
legislation on internal security
The discussion about the legislation on the danger monitoring is in a larger context of security policy measures in Austria and Germany. A report of the Bundesag Balance between security interests and fundamental rights. After the attacks at Breitscheidplatz in 2016, residence, police and criminal law regulations were tightened.
A current law that is intended to improve internal security and the asylum system was adopted at the end of October 2024. This draft law is part of a "security package" that was designed in response to a fatal knife attack in Solingen. In this special context, however, another part of the package, the draft law to improve the fight against terrorism, was rejected in the Federal Council. This setback was attributed to inadequate measures, such as the required data storage of IP addresses.
the rule of law and fight against terrorism
The challenges in fighting terrorism and their compatibility with the rule of law were the subject of a technical discussion that took place in Berlin in November 2024. Organized by Dimr and DAV, the discussion about evidence -based and fundamental rights -oriented security policy revolved. Experts like Eric Töpfer pointed out that only a limited number of new security laws were passed in the current election period, which raises questions about the actual effectiveness of the existing regulations. Many of these laws result in considerable interference in fundamental rights without a comprehensive evaluation.
Especially critical voices, including Thomas Oberhäuser, emphasize that the shortened legal protection in the deportation of the deportation of persons classified as dangerously - in accordance with Section 58a of the Residence Act - creates legal hurdles that make access to the right considerably more difficult. The discussion about the need for the need for new intervention powers in the legislative procedure remains pointed. The Institute for Human Rights refers to the need to take measures against online radicalization and to counter the challenges of the lack of prospects of young refugees.
Overall, it can be seen that developments in the field of security legislation have both opportunities and challenges. The willingness to pursue evidence -based approaches and integrate voices from science and civil society could form a sustainable basis for a future -oriented security policy.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Berlin, Deutschland |
| Quellen | |
Kommentare (0)