JobCenter demands after 16 years of repayment - an unpredictable scandal!

JobCenter demands after 16 years of repayment - an unpredictable scandal!

In a shocking case, a former citizen benefit recipient in Berlin-Pankow surprisingly received mail from the job center-after 16 years! He was asked to repay 375.95 euros, which he initially thought was a joke. The case illustrates how lengthy bureaucratic processes and possible overpayments can lead to recovery. As the person concerned explains, he used to be a Hartz IV recipient and the amount in question concerns a rental deposit that was transferred from the job center to a special rental deposit account. According to social law experts, however, it is highly questionable that the job center will only make such reclaims so late, since many citizens no longer keep documents in such cases.

In addition, it becomes clear in another analysis that job center carry out intensive tests of support services. Last year, the authorities had followed 82,000 references to possible social service fraud, which led to several thousand reclaims. These checks include automated data comparison, in which millions of data packages are exchanged between different authorities. This can have fatal consequences for many citizens' money recipients: you not only have to make repayments, but also assert yourself against possible fraud systems, which can lead to money or even prison terms. Information shows that over 165,000 cases of social law fraud have been uncovered since 2018 and 93 people were sentenced to prison.

shocking claims and legal gray areas

The citizen benefit recipient is convinced that the job center pursues a strategy by asserting such reclaims very late. This could mean that many citizens cannot make a credible contradiction because they no longer have the evidence. However, the job center defends itself and emphasizes that they are legally obliged to remember open claims as long as this is not time -barred. A complex legal environment encloses these retrospective claims because different limitation periods apply to repayments. The case throws a light on the challenges and uncertainties that people are experiencing in dealing with social benefits, as well as "https://www.gege-hartz.de/news/die-jobcenter-millionen-buergergeld-fehnger"> opposite-hartz.de