Process for fatal concrete slab accident: Why does the culprit remain unclear?

Process for fatal concrete slab accident: Why does the culprit remain unclear?

Mülheim an der Ruhr, Deutschland - A dramatic end for the spectacular criminal process about the tragic death of a woman on the A3 motorway: The case that focused on Cologne road traffic safety is set without judgment. The 66-year-old Anne Mutz, who was described as cheerful and loved to be behind the wheel, was the victim of a fatal accident, caused by a ton of concrete slab that fell from a building. Instead of being held responsible for the errors in the construction, the parties involved apparently succeed in repaying the public interest through high payments, while the court is spared an elaborate judgment. The possibility of a review by the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe was avoided, since there is now nothing to be assessed.

shocking parallels to previous cases

The concern about the repeated approaches of the judiciary in similar cases is particularly noticeable. For example, the presiding judge had already imposed the judgment in the case of the Cologne city archive for one year in prison on probation, which was later collected by the BGH. In this procedure too, an attitude ultimately occurred without a clear guilty, which caused great disappointment among the bereaved. The connection of these cases reaffirms the question of responsibility in the construction industry and the protection of public interests, which according to the legal definition should pursue the well -being of the general public, as juraforum.de . It remains to be evaluated whether the repeated non -judgment of those responsible further erodes confidence in the case law.

The legal aspects of this processing raise questions regarding the definition of interests in law. Benefit the parties involved through high cash payments and remains the public interest, as it is standardized in the case law, on the route? Such a collision of interest is more than just a legal problem; It attacks the basic understanding of justice and security on the streets. The demand for clear responsibility and the clarification of all circumstances is now more urgent than ever.