Trump and Stranders argue about security guarantees for Ukraine

Trump and Stranders argue about security guarantees for Ukraine

On Thursday, a bust of Winston Churchill on Keir Strandmer target = "_ blank" href = "https://www.cnn.com/2025/26/starmer-trump-meeting-piew-ukraine-gbr-intl/index.html"> The most difficult visits to a British prime minister has been carried out by a US president of the second world war.

Strander’s important mission in the White House

Straßer has a crucial mission in the Oval Office-he tries to Donald Trump from Russian President Wladimir Putin, security guarantees for the security guarantee To maintain Ukraine for a possible peace agreement and to preserve the transatlantic alliance.

his chances of success seem to be low. The French President Emmanuel Macron was on Monday with a similar concern in Washington and was able to revive his relationship on Monday Trump does not receive specific assurances.

challenges during the flight over the Atlantic

The task that lies before the rather reserved strand became even more complicated than he flew over the Atlantic on Wednesday. In the first cabinet meeting of his new term, Trump rejected the idea of robust US security guarantees for Ukraine, which considers the striker to ensure that a peace agreement has existed.

"I will not give security guarantees beyond a lot. We will be left to Europe ... Europe is your neighbor," said Trump.

But on his flight, Starmer argued that a peace agreement was not sustainable without such a promise from the United States. "I am absolutely convinced that we need a permanent peace, no ceasefire, and we have to have security guarantees for that," said Strander to journalists, as Reuters reported.

ask for a "backstop" for Ukraine

Strait also explained that he would ask the US President about another promise that Trump has reluctant to give -a "backstop" for a "security" force that are willing to send Great Britain and France in the event of a peace agreement. The military in Europe do not have the logistical, intelligence and air defense means that are necessary to secure such a troop without the USA. Stronger expressed concerns that a ceasefire without a backstop would only give Putin the opportunity to wait and attack again, since his ambition in relation to Ukraine is obvious for everyone.

confusion about the planned deal with rare earths

Even with a planned deal that should enable the United States to benefit from the rare earths of Ukraine, there is confusion. Trump said this would reward Washington for military and financial aid during the war. "The deal we make brings us great wealth," said Trump in the cabinet meeting. "We get the money back that we spent." The President had previously claimed that Washington could receive up to $ 500 billion from the agreement that Zelensky had initially rejected when he was presented and the Trump critic described as a colonial robbery on a desperate nation.

But within the framework of Trump's constantly changing foreign policy, he said Zelensky would come to the USA on Friday to sign the agreement. According to Trump, however, none of his claims that Washington will receive money that bid administration transferred to Ukraine mentions a draft copy of the updated agreement.

change of visit and strategy for Ukraine

On the basis of these developments, it is clear that Zelensky has asserted himself against Trump's demands for a significant proportion of revenues from the mineral treasures of Ukraine and laid the basis for future US investments in his country. Nevertheless, Trump's urge to make agreements for her own will may represent the agreement as a massive success, even if the content suggests something else.

Trump, whose worldview is transactional and filtered by his experience as a former real estate developer, also follows great economic deals with Russia, while looking at a summit with Putin that could possibly take place in the coming weeks. Such a meeting and possible agreements with the strongly sanctioned Russia could give the Kremlin room again and undermine the western efforts to punish him for the invasion in Ukraine. This is one of the reasons why Starmer wants to seek clarity about the President's plans during his stay in the USA.

strand on the political balancing acts

Straßer’s visit to Trump is the most difficult moment of his young term after he won an overwhelming election victory last year.

He is not the first British leader to have decisive conversations in the White House. For example, Margaret Thatcher helped President Ronald Reagan in the fight against the Soviet Union. Prime Minister Tony Blair also traveled to President George W. Bush when both countries moved to the fatal Iraq war. But Straßer has to do with a president who previously takes unimaginable steps to threaten the global order based on the rule, which Churchill outlined with President Franklin Roosevelt at the beginning of the Second World War.

Some European NATO countries are now hastily promised to spend more for defense after Trump had bitterly complained that Washington was used for a long time. In order to impress Trump, Starmer announced this week that Great Britain will increase its armor expenditure to 2.5 % of GDP by 2027, in the hope of a further increase to 3 % after the next elections in 2029.

"We have to change our national security strategy because a cross -generational challenge requires a cross -generational answer," said Straßer. The British government had previously given the 2.5 % promise, but had not set the target. However, Trump could not impress the number because he demands that the defense expenditure of NATO members increase to 5 % of GDP, while the current US expenditure is around 3.4 %.

meetings between US President and British prime ministers often arouse nostalgic memories of solidarity during the war and tribute to the "special relationship", even if this relationship often seems to please more colonial power than the nation, which it has replaced as a dominant superpower.

But Trump is less impressed by historical allusions and common democratic values than most presidents-although he brought the Churchill bust back to the Oval Office when his second term began a month ago. Instead, he has an unmistakable sense of the relative weakness of most foreign nations compared to the United States.

Straßer, a modest former lawyer and left -wing human rights lawyer, is facing Trump in almost every respect. It is also less inclined than the theatrical Macron to imitate Trump's showmanship. But he connects one thing with the president-to win the insatiable will, which showed up in his revival of the Labor Party and her march for victory last year.

Strand made sure to hit Trump in the Trump Tower in New York before his election victory last November, and the President praised him as a "nice guy". However, such compliments are changeable in the world of Trump. This week, for example, he accused Macron and Strander to do "nothing" about the Ukraine War.

The Prime Minister, however, has a unique trick in his pocket for the meeting in the Oval Office: A potential invitation for Trump for a state visit to Great Britain at the invitation of King Charles III. The President loves British pomp and had a preference for Queen Elizabeth II who died, who was a favorite of his late Scottish mother. Trump had received a state visit to the deceased Queen in 2019, according to which Trump claimed that "she hadn't had so much fun in 25 years".