Celler Putz-Posse: Refugees live like in the luxury hotel!

Celler Putz-Posse: Refugees live like in the luxury hotel!

In the Lower Saxony city of Celle it rumbles tremendously! But hardly to believe: The city is urgently looking for cleaning staff for its refugee homes. But instead of supplying the residents themselves with brooms and mop, external forces are to be hired. And the best thing about it? According to the public service's collective agreement, the cleaner is remunerated, including a juicy difficulty allowance of 145 euros! We can only speculate why this surcharge is necessary at a cleaning site. According to Reitschuster it almost sounds as if the work in an asylum competition home is associated with special risks. You have to let that melt on your tongue!

The task list is long: functional areas, tea kitchens, corridors and rooms from collective accommodation should be cleaned professionally. In view of the fact that a family with two children usually receives less support than the cleaning power, this fuels heated debates. Why don't the residents just clean themselves, some are wondering. Because asylum seekers are not allowed to work regularly due to a lack of a residence permit and theoretically could not even clean their own rooms without anger. What a bureaucratic dilemma! Isn't it surprising how a complex matter is made from a simple cleaning problem?

sensational solutions or just absurd?

The fact that severely disabled people should be taken into account when it comes to the applicant selection, which shows that physical impairments cannot be the reason for external cleaning force. Has a new dimension of hospitality been reached here by bringing refugee accommodation at luxury hotel level? Wouldn't it be easier to add additional services such as a concierge or a wellness offer?

The city administration does not seem to have any problem spending taxpayers for the cleaner, while asylum seekers learn that the state regulates everything for them. A message that counteracts any integration incentives. Imagine that there are also driving services for necessary gears to authorities. After all, public transport has not only become unreliable nowadays, but also felt more insecure.

What does the public say?

Some votes from the public are surprised at the priorities of this regulation. A instagram post of Reitschuster According to many the same explosive question: "Why should the state fund be cleaning asylum. It is a debate that affects not only the costs, but also the basic principles of integration. Even among those who support these measures, there is a discomfort about the direction in which the system moves.

FAZIT: What remains is the serious question of how long we as a society are willing to create more and more problems that do not exist from the outset. And when will we start finding sustainable solutions that are not only fair, but also portable?